Pilonidal sinus in children: characteristic, circumstances, methods of treatment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15574/PS.2019.62.67Keywords:
pilonidal sinus, surgical treatment, coloproctologyAbstract
This review highlights the epidemiological, clinical and diagnostic aspects of the pilonidal sinus. It was analyzed the modern methods of diagnosis and treatment of this pathology and revealed the problematic issues of relapse of the disease.References
An VV, Rivkin VL. (2003). Emergency proctology. Irkutsk: Medpraktika-M: 144.
Bashankaev NA, Solomka YaA, Topchiy SN. (2003). Use of a deaf seam at radical operations for acute suppurative inflammation of the pilonidal sinus. Outpatient surgery. 2 (10):45–47.
Valieva EK. (2006). Optimization of surgical methods of treatment of patients with suppressed pilonidal sinus: dis. cand. honey. sciences. Bashkir State Medical University un-t Ufa:116.
Vorobiev GI. (2006). Basics of Coloproctology. Moscow: Medical Information Agency LLC: 432.
Datsenko BM, Datsenko AB, Mohammed AD. (2004). Optimization of the two-stage surgical treatment program for acute suppuration of the pilonidal sinus. Coloproctology. 3(9):61–62.
Kaiser Andreas M. (2011). Colorectal surgery. Moscow: BINOM Publishing House: 737.
Kondratenko PG, Gubergrits NB, Elin FE, Smirnov NL. (2006). Clinical Coloproctology: A Guide for Physicians. Kharkov:Fact: 385.
Lurin IA, Tsema EV. (2013). Etiology and pathogenesis of pilonidal disease. Coloproctology. 3:35–49.
Magomedova ZK, Chernyshov EV, Groschilin VS. (2015). Comparative analysis of the results of treatment of recurrent pilonidal sinuses and fistulas of the sacrococcygeal region. Med vestn South of Russia. 3:60–63.
Murtazaev TS. (2008). Clinical and anatomical rationale for the choice of the method of surgical treatment of the pilonidal sinus and its complications. Stavropol:152.
Popkov OV et al. (2017). Pilonidal sinus. Methods of surgical treatment. Military Medicine.1:101–106.
Tsema YeV. (2013). Comparative analysis of the results of surgical treatment of recurrent pilonidal sinus. Zhurn. klіn. that eksperim. honey. doslіzhen. 1;4:419–426.
Shelygin YuA, Grateful LA. (2012). Handbook of coloproctology. Moscow: Litterra:596.
Aldean I, Shankar P, Mathew J et al. (2005). Simple excision and primary closure of pilonidal sinus: a simple modification of conventional technique with excellent results. Colorectal Dis. 7:81–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00736.x; PMid:15606592
Arumugam P, Chandrasekaran T, Morgan A et al. (2003). The rhomboid flap for pilonidal disease. Colorectal Dis. 5:218–221. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00435.x; PMid:12780881
Bessa SS. (2013). Comparison of short-term results between the modified Karydakis flap and the modified Limberg flap in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled study. Dis Colon Rect. 56(4):491–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e31828006f7; PMid:23478617
Chintapatla S, Safarani N, Kumar S. (2003). Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: historical review, pathological insight and surgical options. Tech Coloproctol. 7: 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101510300001; PMid:12750948
Cihan A, Ucan B, Comert M et al. (2006). Superiority of asymmetric modified limberg flap for surgical treatment of pilonidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 49: 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0253-z; PMid:16322964
Daphan C, Tekelioglu H, Sayilgan C. (2004). Limberg Flap Repair for Pilonidal Sinus Disease. Dis Colon Rectum.47:233–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-003-0037-2; PMid:15043295
Enriquez-Navascues JM, Emparanza JI, Alkorta M, Placer C. (2014). Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing different techniques with primary closure for chronic pilonidal sinus. Tech Coloproctol. 18:863–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1149-5; PMid:24845110
Ersoy OF, Karaca S, Kayaoglu HA. (2007). Comparison of different surgical options in the treatment of pilonidal desease: retrospective analysis of 175 patients. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 23(2):67–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70377-8
Fabricius R, Wiuff L, Bertelsen CA. (2010). Treatment of pilonidal sinuses in Denmark is not optimal. Dan Med. Bul. 57(12):A 4200.
Fazeli M, Adel M, Lebaschi A. (2006). Comparison of 39 outcomes in Z-plasty and delayed healing by secondary intention of the wound after excision of the sacral pilonidal sinus: results of a randomized, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 49:1831–1836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0726-8; PMid:17080281
Golladay E. (2004). Outpatient adolescent surgical problems. Adolesc Med Clin. 15:503–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.admecli.2004.06.004; PMid:15625990
Hart J. (2002). Inflammation 2: its role in the healing of chronic wounds. J Wound Care. 11:245–249. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2002.11.7.26416; PMid:12192842
Jeffery M, Billingham N, Billingham R. (2007). Pilonidal Disease and Hidradenitis Suppurativa. In: Wolff B, Fleshman J, Beck D et al (Eds). The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery. 1st ed. New York: Springer:228–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36374-5_15
Jones DJ. (1992). Pilonidal sinus. ABC of colorectal diseases. BMJ. 305:410–412. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.305.6850.410; PMid:1392926 PMCid:PMC1883113
Kapan M, Kapan S, Pekmezci S et al. (2002). Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease with Limberg flap repair. Tech Coloproctol. 6:27–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101510200005; PMid:12077638
Kaymakcioglu N, Yagci G, Simsek A et al. (2005). Treatment of pilonidal sinus by phenol application and factors affecting the recurrence. Tech Coloproctol. 9:21–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-005-0187-4; PMid:15868494
Lindholt-Jensen CS, Lindholt JS, Beyer M et al. (2012). Nd-YAG treatment of primary and recurrent pilonidal sinus. Lasers Med Sci.27:505–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0990-2; PMid:21927795
Mahdy T. (2008). Surgical treatment of the pilonidal disease: primary closure or flap reconstruction after excision. Dis Colon Rectum. 51:1816–1822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9436-8; PMid:18937009
Omer Y, Hayrettin D, Murat C, Mustafa Y, Evren D. (2015). Comparison of modified Limberg flap and modified elliptical rotation flap for pilonidal sinus surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 16:74–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.02.024; PMid:25758346
Oncel M, Kurt N, Kement M. (2002). Excision and marsupialization versus sinus excision for the treatment of limited chronic pilonidal disease: a prospective, randomized trial. Tech Coloproctol. 6:165–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101510200037; PMid:12525910
Oueidat D, Rizkallah A, Dirani M et al. (2014). 25 years’ experience in the management of pilonidal sinus disease. Open J Gastro. 4:1–5. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojgas.2014.41001
Page BH. (1969). The entry of hair into a pilonidal sinus. Br J Surg.56:32. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800560107; PMid:5766317
Petersen S, Koch R, Stelzner S et al. (2002). Primary closure techniques in chronic pilonidal sinus. A survey of the results of different surgical approaches. Dis Colon Rectum. 45:1458–1467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6451-2; PMid:12432292
Sakr M, Elserafy M, Hamed H. (2012). Management of 634 Consecutive patients with chronic pilonidal sinus: a nine-year experience of a single institute. Surgical Science. 3:145–154. https://doi.org/10.4236/ss.2012.33029
Segre D, Pozzo M, Perinotti R, Roche B. (2015). Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery: The treatment of pilonidal disease: guidelines of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR). Tech Coloproctol. 19:607–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1369-3; PMid:26377583
Soll C, Dindo D, Steinmann D. (2011). Sinusectomy for primary pilonidal sinus: less no more. Surgery. 150(5):996–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2011.06.019; PMid:21911239
Testini M, Piccinni G, Miniello S et al. (2001). Treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus with local anaesthesia: a randomized trial of closed compared with open technique. Colorectal Dis. 3:427–430. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-1318.2001.00278.x; PMid:12790943
Topgul K, O zdemir E, Kilic K et al. (2003). Long-Term Results of Limberg Flap Procedure for Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus. A Report of 200 Cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 46:1545–1548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6811-y; PMid:14605577
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
The policy of the Journal “PAEDIATRIC SURGERY. UKRAINE” is compatible with the vast majority of funders' of open access and self-archiving policies. The journal provides immediate open access route being convinced that everyone – not only scientists - can benefit from research results, and publishes articles exclusively under open access distribution, with a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 international license(СС BY-NC).
Authors transfer the copyright to the Journal “PAEDIATRIC SURGERY.UKRAINE” when the manuscript is accepted for publication. Authors declare that this manuscript has not been published nor is under simultaneous consideration for publication elsewhere. After publication, the articles become freely available on-line to the public.
Readers have the right to use, distribute, and reproduce articles in any medium, provided the articles and the journal are properly cited.
The use of published materials for commercial purposes is strongly prohibited.