The value of a comprehensive assessment of the integrated indicator of endogenous intoxication of the organism and ultrasound imaging in the diagnostic process of the acute appendicitis in childhood

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15574/PS.2021.73.59

Keywords:

intoxication index, ultrasound, appendicitis

Abstract

Traditionally, in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and endogenous intoxication that accompanies its course, hemogram indicators and a wide range of proposed hematological indices are widely used. However, as practice shows, the isolated study of the hemogram, even with the involvement of its integral indices, especially in the early stages of pathology, is not enough for its timely diagnosis, and even more so the differential diagnosis. An important additional method of diagnosing acute appendicitis is ultrasound.

Purpose – on the basis of specific clinical observation in the dynamics of the abdominal pain syndrome to determine the complex diagnostic significance of the integrated indicator of endotoxicosis of the body and ultrasound.

Materials and methods. As an integral indicator of endogenous intoxication, the integrated indicator proposed by the authors was chosen, which was calculated based on the indicators of the general analysis of peripheral blood: the number of leukocytes, ESR and leukogram indicators according to the formula. To facilitate the calculation of the value of the total index of endogenous intoxication, a calculator based on a program for working with Excel spreadsheets was developed, in the environment of which the proposed index formula was integrated. Ultrasound examination was performed with Doppler scanning on ultrasound machines «SAMSUNG H60» (manufactured in South Korea) and «SAMSUNG» LS22EMU1HS (Seoul. Korea, 2016).

Results. Simultaneous comparison of the dynamics of local changes in the clinical picture, hemogram, the magnitude of endogenous intoxication and visual findings in ultrasound of the abdomen allows to avoid unwarranted surgery in patients with abdominal pain.

Conclusions. Properly collected anamnesis, assessment of physical and clinical and laboratory parameters and data of laboratory methods of examination, the involvement of the necessary narrow specialists allows to avoid mistakes in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children. It is expedient and justified in the diagnostic assessment of the clinical picture in case of suspicion of acute appendicitis to compare the indicators of the integrated index of endogenous intoxication, namely the total index of endogenous intoxication with ultrasound visualization of the appendix in the dynamics of the pathological process.

The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local ethics committee of the participating institution. The informed consent of the patient was obtained for conducting the studies.

No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

References

Akylov KhA, Urmanov NT, Prymov FSh et al. (2019). Opіt lechenyia ostroho appendytsyta v Tashkente. Detskaia khyrurhyia. 23 (3): 157-160. https://doi.org/10.18821/1560-9510-2019-23-3-157-160

Alekberadze AV, Lypnytskyi EM. (2017). Ostryi appendytsyt. Moskva: Yzd-vo FHBOU VO Pervyi Moskovskyi hos Unyversytet ym Y. M. Sechenova: 38.

Bachur RG, Callahan MJ, Monuteaux MC et al. (2015, May). Integration of ultrasound findings and a clinical score in the diagnostic evaluation of pediatric appendicitis. J Pediatr. 166 (5): 1134-1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.01.034; PMid:25708690

Bariaeva OE, Florensov VV, Kuzmyna NY. (2009). Dyfferentsyalnaia dmahnostyka abdomynalnoho bolevoho syndroma u devochek. Sybyrskyi medytsynskyi zhurnal. 3: 170-171.

Dmytryeva EV, Bulanov MN, Nesterenko TS, Permynov EN, Shakhnyna YA. (2012). Vozmozhnosty ultrazvukovoho yssledovanyia v dyahnostyke ostroho flehmonoznoho appendytsyta u detei. Vestnyk Yvanovskoi medytsynskoi akademyy. 17 (2): 34-41.

Eng KA, Abadeh A, Ligocki C et al. (2018, Sep). Acute appendicitis: a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of US, CT, and MRI as second-line imaging tests after an initial US. Radiology. 288 (3): 717-727. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018180318; PMid:29916776

Konoplitskyi VS, Korobko YuYe, Motyhin VV. (2020). Intehralna otsinka endohennoi intoksykatsii orhanizmu v prohnozuvanni form perebihu hostroho apendytsytu u ditei. Art of Medicine. 3 (15): 92-97.

Loskutova TO, Petrashenko II, Petulko AP. (2015). Pokaznyky intoksykatsii v diahnostytsi hostroho apendytsytu u vahitnykh. Aktualni pytannia pediatrii, akusherstva ta hinekolohii. 2: 117-120.

Markyn LB, Yakovleva EB. (2004). Detskaia hynekolohyia. Kyiv. Znanye: 476.

Pavlova TV, Pylkevych NB, Pavlova LA, Lysov AE. (2017). Patofyzyolohycheskye osobennosty hemohrammy u detei s razlychnymy formamy ostroho appendytsyta. Kubanskyi nauchnyi medytsynskyi vestnyk. 1 (162): 103-106. https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2017-1-103-106

Petriaikyna EE, Savenkova MS, Koptunov YE. (2020). Dyfferentsyalnaia dyahnostyka bolei v zhyvote u devochek y devushek. Trudnyi dyahnoz v pedyatryy. K 115 letyiu Morozovskoi bolnytsy. 2: 232-235.

Samusenko AA, Raianov NV. (2018). Dyahnostycheskye oshybky v dyahnostyke ostroho appendytsyta u detei. Vestnyk Severo-Zapadnoho hosudarstvennoho medytsynskoho unyversyteta ym. Y. Y. Mechnykova. 10 (1): 86-88. https://doi.org/10.17816/mechnikov201810186-88

Sovtsov S. A. (2013). Ostryi appendytsyt: chto yzmenylos v nachale novoho veka? Khyrurhyia. 7: 37-42.

Sovtsov SA. (2002). Ostryi appendytsyt: spornye voprosy. Khyrurhyia. 1: 59-61.

Sovtsov SA. (2016). Letopys chastoi khyrurhyy. 1: appendytsyt. Cheliabynsk: 199.

Speranskyi YY, Samoilenko HE, Lobacheva MV. (2009). Obshchyi analyz krovy - vse ly eho vozmozhnosty yscherpany? Yntehralnye yndeksy yntoksykatsyy kak kryteryy otsenky tiazhesty techenyia endohennoi yntoksykatsy, eyo oslozhnenyi y effektyvnosty provodymoho lechenyia. Ostrye y neotlozhnye sostoianyia v praktyke vracha. 6: 26-31.

Terasawa T, Blackmore CC, Bent S et al. (2004, Oct 5). Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasonography to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Ann Intern Med. 141 (7): 537-546. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00011; PMid:15466771

Vasylev AIu, Olkhova EB. (2010). Ultrazvukovaia dyahnostyka v neotlozhnoi detskoi praktyke. Moskva: HEOTAR-Medya: 832.

Yeh B. (2008). Evidence-based emergency medicine/rational clinical examination abstract. Does this adult patient have appendicitis? Ann Emerg Med. 52 (3): 301-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.10.023; PMid:18763359

Yshmanov MIu, Sertakova AV, Soloveva AM, Fediashyna NA, Shcherbakova EV. (2017). 250 pokazatelei zdorovia. Unyversalnыi spravochnyk. Moskva: T8RUGRAM. Nauchnaia knyha: 602.

Zhang H, Bai Y, Wang W. (2018). Nonoperative management of appendiceal phlegmon or abscess in children less than 3 years of age. World journal of Emergency Surgery. 13: 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-018-0170-9; PMid:29507603 PMCid:PMC5834882

Zhang H, Liao M, Chen J et al. (2017, Feb). Ultrasound, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging - which is preferred for acute appendicitis in children? A Meta-analysis. Pediatr Radiol. 47 (2): 186-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3727-3; PMid:27815615

Published

2021-12-30

Issue

Section

Original articles. Abdominal surgery