The main risk factors for reoperations in children with congenital diaphragmatic hernias

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15574/PS.2022.74.20

Keywords:

congenital diaphragmatic hernia, reoperations, intestinal obstruction, gastroesophageal reflux, recurrence, malrotation, thoracatomy, laparotomy

Abstract

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) occurs with a frequency of 3.5 per 10,000 live births and occurs due to a fusion disorder of the closure of the pleuroperitoneal fold and transverse septum during 8-12 weeks of gestation. In an isolated variant of this pathology, mortality is quite high and there are a number of controversial issues. Even in the best specialized prenatal intensive care centers, the mortality rate reaches 30%. The use of new technologies in the treatment of CDH has increased the survival rate of patients, however, against this background, there is an increase in surgical problems associated with CDH.

Purpose - to describe the structure and incidence of reoperations in children with CDH, depending on the access, identification of the main risk factors for reoperations, pathogenetic justification of optimal surgical access.

Materials and methods. A retrospective cohort study of surgical correction of CDH in 104 infants who were operated on the basis of the NCH «OKHMATDYT» during 2000-2020 was conducted. To homogenize the group and to maximally exclude selection bias in order to identify risk factors, we include a group of patients with left-sided CDH in the study. Correction of the left-sided CDH was performed through the laparotomic approach in 51 patients (61%). Thoracotomy for left-sided EDH was used in 33 (39%) patients.

Results. In the study group of patients, 14 (16.7%) reoperations were performed in this group at different times of the long-term period. The indications for reoperations were: adhesive intestinal obstruction - 3 (21.5%), inc. strangulated intestinal obstruction with bowel necrosis - 2 (14%), obstruction caused by malrotation - 1 (7%), gastroesophageal reflux - 4 (29.5%), recurrent hernia - 2 (14%), pectus excavatum - 1 (7%), spleen torsion - 1 (7%). The number of reoperations in the study group during a certain observation period was slightly higher in the thoracotomy group (18% versus 14%, p=0.80). More than half of repeated interventions were associated with acute intestinal obstruction, more often after laparotomy (35.7 versus 7%; p=0.16). In this group, 5 reoperations were performed, the cause of which was intestinal obstruction, in contrast to the thoracic group, where one patient was operated for malrotation. Reoperations for recurrent diaphragmatic hernia occurred only in the thoracotomy group in one patient with agenesis of the left diaphragm dome. Early postoperative mortality was found slightly higher in the laparotomy group (27.4% versus 18.1%; p=0.167).

Conclusions. The optimal method of surgical treatment of large defects and agenesis of the dome is surgical correction of the diaphragm through a thoracotomy approach using a synthetic patch and thoracalization of the abdominal cavity. The abdominal approach has a high risk of reoperations, which is associated with the development of the adhesive process and the likelihood of the formation of ventral hernias due to viscero-abdominal imbalance. The indications for the use of thoracic access and patches for plasty of the diaphragm defect should be expanded regardless of the side of the lesion and the size of the defect. The main factors determining the risk of recurrent CDH are the size of the hernial defect and the method of diaphragm correction.

The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local ethics committee of all participating institutions. The informed consent of the patient was obtained for conducting the studies.

No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

References

Bagolan P, Morini F. (2007). Long-term follow up of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Pediatr Surg. 16 (2): 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2007.01.009; PMid:17462566

Bruns NE, Glenn IC, McNinch NL et al. (2016). Approach to recurrent congenital diaphragmatic hernia: results of an international survey. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 26 (11): 925-929. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2016.0247; PMid:27705081

Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group, Lally KP, Lally PA, Lasky RE, Tibboel D, Jaksic T, Wilson JM, Frenckner B, Van Meurs KP, Bohn DJ, Davis CF, Hirschl RB. (2007). Defect Size Determines Survival in Infants With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia. Pediatrics. 120: 651-657. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-3040; PMid:17766505

De Bie F et al. (2020). Early surgical complications after congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair by thoracotomy vs. laparotomy: A bicentric comparison. Journal of pediatric surgery. 55 (10): 2105-2110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.12.020; PMid:32005504

Hume JB. (1922). Congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Br J Surg. 10 (38): 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800103806

Jancelewicz T, Vua LT, Keller RL et al. (2010). Long-term surgical outcomes in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: observations from a single institution. J of Pediatr Surgery. 45: 155-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.10.028; PMid:20105597

Kawahara H, Okuyama H, Nose K et al. (2010). Physiological and clinical characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux after congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair. J of Pediatric Surgery. 45: 2346-2350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.08.029; PMid:21129542

Kawahara H, Okuyama H, Nose K, Nakai H, Yoneda A, Kubota A, Fukuzawa M. (2010). Physiological and clinical characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux after congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair. J of Pediatric Surgery. 45: 2346-2350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.08.029; PMid:21129542

Kotecha S, Barbato A, Bush A et al. (2012). Congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Eur Respir J. 39 (4): 820-829. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00066511; PMid:22034651

Kryvchenia DIu et al. (2015). Rezultaty likuvannia ditei z vrodzhenymy diafrahmalnymy hryzhamy z hrupy vysokoho ryzyku. Medychna nauka Ukrainy. 11 (3-4): 76-82.

Kryvchenia DIu, Benzar IM, Blikhar VIe. (2015). Diafrahmalni hryzhi u ditei. Problemni pytannia diahnostyky i likuvannia : navch. posib. Ternopil. Ukrmedknyha: 80.

Kryvchenia DIu, Benzar IM, Rudenko YeO, Shulzhyk II. (2015). Povtorni operatsii u ditei z vrodzhenymy diafrahmalnymy hryzhamy z hrupy vysokoho ryzyku. Neonatolohiia, khirurhiia ta perynatalna medytsyna. 5 (3 (17)): 67-71. https://doi.org/10.24061/2413-4260.V.3.17.2015.11

Kryvchenia DY, Prytula VP, Rudenko EO, Hussaini SF, Shulzhyk II. (2020). Hypermobile spleen in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Prevention and correction of complications. Paediatric Surgery.Ukraine. 2(67): 22-28. https://doi.org/10.15574/PS.2020.67.22

Putnam LR, Tsao K, Lally KP et al. (2017). Minimally invasive vs open congenital diaphrag- matic hernia repair: is there a superior approach? J Am Coll Surg. 224 (4): 416-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.050; PMid:28147253

Waag KL, Loff S, Zahn K et al. (2008). Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a modern day approach. Seminars in Pediatric Surgery. 17: 244-254. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2008.07.009; PMid:19019293

Waag KL, Loff S, Zahn K, Ali M, Hien S, Kratz M, Neff W, Schaffelder R, Schaible T. (2008). Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a modern day approach. Seminars in Pediatric Surgery. 17: 244-254. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2008.07.009; PMid:19019293

Zani A, Eaton S, Puri P et al. (2016). International survey on the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 26 (1): 38-46.

Zani A, Ruttenstock E, Pierro A. (2014). Advancesinthesurgicalapproachtocongenital diaphragmatic hernia. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 19 (6): 364-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2014.09.002; PMid:25447986

Published

2022-03-30

Issue

Section

Original articles. Thoracic surgery