Microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy in children and adolescents. Modified technique with lymphatic vessel contrast enhancement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15574/PS.2023.78.103Keywords:
varicocele, microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy, methylene blue, childrenAbstract
A varicocele is one of the most common causes of spermatogenesis and infertility disorders, which can be corrected. With the advent of high-quality optical operating systems, subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy has been added to the pediatric urologist’s arsenal. One of the most unresolved problems of using this operation in children is postoperative hydrocele and possible damage to the testicular artery due to its small size, which leads to testicular atrophy. To solve this problem, lymphatic vessel contrast with 1% methylene blue was used to verify lymphatic vessels and indirectly visualize the testicular artery.
Purpose - to develop a modified technique of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy with intraoperative contrast of lymphatic vessels in children; to evaluate the results of surgical treatment of varicocele using this technique.
Materials and methods. The study included 65 boys aged 11 to 17 years with a confirmed diagnosis of grade III varicocele and recurrent testicular pain or testicular hypotrophy. Patients were randomized into 2 clinical groups for classical or modified varicocelectomy. The success of treatment was evaluated after 6 months. The Group I included 34 patients who underwent classical subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy; the Group II included 31 patients who underwent modified surgery.
Results. No cases of complications and recurrence of the disease in the late postoperative period were recorded in the group using the modified technique, while in the group with the standard technique, such cases were detected in 17.6% of patients. In addition, it was found that intraoperative contrasting of lymphatic vessels made it possible to clearly identify the testicular artery in all cases in the group with the modified technique, while in the group with the standard technique it was visualized only in half of the cases. No intraoperative complications, hypersensitivity, or allergies were noted during the operation.
Conclusions. A modified varicocele treatment with intraoperative lymphatic vessel contrast may be more effective and safe for patients with this disease due to vein visualization, as the artery and ductus deferens remain the only unchanged structures due to the use of a compression test and lymphatic vessel contrast.
The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of the institution mentioned in the work. Informed consent was obtained from the patients for the research.
No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.
References
Abd Ellatif ME El Nakeeb A, Shoma AM, Abbas AE, Askar W, Noman N. (2011). Dye assisted lymphatic sparing subinguinal varicocelectomy. A prospective randomized study. Int J Surg. 9 (8): 626-631. Epub 2011 Aug 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.07.430; PMid:21875697
Bogaert, G et al. (2013). Pubertal screening and treatment for varicocele do not improve chance of paternity as adult. J Urol. 189: 2298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.030; PMid:23261480
Close Lemack GE, Uzzo RG, Schlegel PN, Goldstein M. (1998). Microsurgical repair of the adolescent varicocele. J Urol. 160: 179-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63086-6; PMid:9628646
EAU. (2023). Guidelines on pediatric urology 2023. URL: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/paediatric-urology.
Evers JL, Collins JA. (2003, May 31). Assessment of efficacy of varicocele repair for male subfertility: a systematic review. Lancet. 361 (9372): 1849-1852. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13503-9; PMid:12788571
Ghanem H, Anis T, El-Nashar A, Shamloul R. (2004, Nov). Subinguinal microvarico-celectomy versus retroperitoneal varicocelectomy: comparative study of complications and surgical outcome. Urology. 64; 5: 1005-1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2004.06.060; PMid:15533495
Goldstein M et al. (1992). Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with delivery of the testis: an artery and lymphatic sparing technique. J Urol. 148: 1808. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1433614. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37035-0; PMid:1433614
Harel M, Herbst KW, Nelson E. (2015, Dec 14). Practice patterns in the surgical approach for adolescent varicocelectomy. Springerplus. 4: 772. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1573-7; PMid:26697282 PMCid:PMC4678127
Jarow JP, Sharlip ID, Belker AM, Lipshultz LI, Sigman M, Thomas AJ et al. (2002). Best practice policies for male infertility. J Urol. 167: 2138-2144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65109-9; PMid:11956464
Kamal KM, Javeri K, Zini A. (2017). Microsurgical varicocelectomy in the era of assisted reproductive technology: influence of initial semen quality on pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 75: 1013-1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01698-3; PMid:11334918
Kocvara R, Dolezal J, Hampl R, Povysil G, Dvoracek KJ, Hill M et al. (2003). Division of lymphatic vessels at varicocelectomy leads to testicular oedema and decline in testicular function according to the LH-RH analogue stimulation test. Eur Urol. 43: 430-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00051-4; PMid:12667726
Kuas N, Ergün E, Bülbül M, Göllü G, Çakmak AM, Koloğlu MB et al. (2022). A Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic Varicocelectomy Results in Adolescents, Journal of Ankara University Faculty of Medicine. 75; 2: 248-252. https://doi.org/10.4274/atfm.galenos.2022.55706
Patil N et al. (2022). Varicocelectomy in adolescents - Does it safeguard future fertility? A single centre experience. J Pediatr Urol. 18: 5.e1. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34980555/. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.11.020; PMid:34980555
Redmon JB, Carey P, Pryor JL. (2022). Varicocele - the most common cause of male factor infertility. Hum Reprod Update. 8: 53-58. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/8.1.53; PMid:11866240
Schwentner C, Radmayr C, Lunacek A, Gozzi C, Pinggera GM, Neururer R et al. (2006). Laparoscopic varicocele ligation in children and adolescents using is.
Tulloch WS. (1984, Dec). Classic articles of urology revisited. Varicocele in subfertility. Results of treatment. By W. Selby Tulloch. 1955. Urology. 24(6): 647-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(84)90125-0
Vaganée D et al. (2018). Testicular asymmetry in healthy adolescent boys. BJU Int. 122: 654. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29461677/. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14174
PMid:29461677
VanderBrink BA, Palmer LS, Gitlin J, Franco I, Levitt SB, Franco I. (2007). Lymphatic-sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy versus microscopic varicocelectomy: is there a difference? Pediatric urology. 70; 6: 1207-1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.036; PMid:18158049
Zampieri N et al. (2018). Semen analysis in patients treated for varicocele in pediatric age: are surgical outcomes enough to preserve the fertility potential? Am J Clin Exp Urol, 6: 149. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30038947/.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Paediatric Surgery (Ukraine)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The policy of the Journal “PAEDIATRIC SURGERY. UKRAINE” is compatible with the vast majority of funders' of open access and self-archiving policies. The journal provides immediate open access route being convinced that everyone – not only scientists - can benefit from research results, and publishes articles exclusively under open access distribution, with a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 international license(СС BY-NC).
Authors transfer the copyright to the Journal “PAEDIATRIC SURGERY.UKRAINE” when the manuscript is accepted for publication. Authors declare that this manuscript has not been published nor is under simultaneous consideration for publication elsewhere. After publication, the articles become freely available on-line to the public.
Readers have the right to use, distribute, and reproduce articles in any medium, provided the articles and the journal are properly cited.
The use of published materials for commercial purposes is strongly prohibited.
