Surgical aspects of treatment of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers with combined complications of penetration, stenosis and acute bleeding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15574/PS.2023.81.37Keywords:
perforating gastroduodenal ulcer, combined complications, bleeding, penetration, stenosis, peritonitis, gastric resection, organ-preserving operationsAbstract
The problem of surgical treatment of perforation of gastroduodenal ulcers (GDU) remains relevant and difficult, despite the introduction of new schemes of anti-ulcer and eradication therapy. Algorithms of surgical approaches and tactics of surgical treatment of patients with perforated GDU in combination with other complications in various combinations have not been developed.
Purpose - to improve the results of surgical treatment of GDU with associated complications.
Materials and methods. The results of surgical treatment of patients with complicated GDU for the period from 2000 to 2022 are presented. In total, 353 (100%) patients with perforated GDU in combination with other complications (a combination of two or more complications) were operated on. There were 52 (14.7%) patients with gastric ulcer perforation, and 301 (85.3%) patients with duodenal perforation. There were 267 (75.6%) patients with a combination of two complications; with a combination of three complications in 78 (22.1%) patients; four - 8 (2.3%) patients. The combination of perforation with gastrointestinal bleeding was observed in 138 (39.1%) patients.
Results. The vast majority of patients (267 (75.6%)) had a combination of two complications. The number of patients with a combination of three complications was 78 (22.1%). The number of patients with a combination of all complications was insignificant - 8 (2.3%) people. The implementation of the developed algorithm made it possible to reduce the number of postoperative complications and mortality from 12% to 6.5%. The highest rate of complications and mortality was observed among patients with a combination of multiple (three and four) complications who underwent gastric resection - 3 (33.3%) patients, and the lowest mortality rate was observed among patients who underwent organ-preserving operations - 6 (2.8%) patients.
Conclusions. In patients with perforated GDU in combination with bleeding, the use of endoscopic hemostasis made it possible to stabilize the patient and better prepare him for surgical intervention, and reduce the number of postoperative complications and mortality rates by almost 2 times. The use of resection techniques was extremely limited and had the highest rate of complications and mortality. Implementation of the developed algorithm made it possible to optimize surgical tactics when combining perforation with other complications of GDU.
The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The research protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of the institution mentioned in the work. Informed consent of the patients was obtained for the research.
No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.
References
Dhruv S, Gurala D, Philipose J, Gumaste V. (2021). Gastropancreatic Fistula: A Rare Complication of Peptic Ulcer Disease. ACG case reports journal. 8(7): e00622. PMID: 34258303. https://doi.org/10.14309/crj.0000000000000622; PMid:34258303 PMCid:PMC8270629
Dias E, Cardoso H, Costa C, Macedo G. (2022). Gastric ulcer with liver penetration. Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas. 114(4): 248-249. PMID: 35000403. https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2022.8528/2021
Dolimov KS, Аbdumazhidov AS, Тukhtamurod ZZ, Аshurmetov AM, Аkhmedov MJ, Zhafarov KM. (2016). Tactics of treatment of perforative gastroduodenal ulcer. Klinichna khirurhiia. (10): 15-16. PMID: 30479106.
Du LJ, Chen BR, Kim JJ, Kim S, Shen JH, Dai N. (2016). Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy for functional dyspepsia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. World journal of gastroenterology. 22(12): 3486-3495. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i12.3486; PMid:27022230 PMCid:PMC4806206
Fomin PD, Shepetko EM, Kozlov SM. (2019). Analysis of the efficiency of the algorithm for the selection of treatment tactics in patients with acute bleeding pyloroduodenal ulcer. Ukrainian journal of minimally invasive and endoscopic surgery. 11: 28-29.
Hudnall A, Bardes JM, Coleman K, Stout C, Regier D, Balise S et al. (2022). The surgical management of complicated peptic ulcer disease: An EAST video presentation. The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. 93(1): e12-e16. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003636; PMid:35358158 PMCid:PMC9233136
Kamada T, Satoh K, Itoh T, Ito M, Iwamoto J, Okimoto T et al. (2021). Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer disease 2020. Journal of gastroenterology. 56(4): 303-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-021-01769-0; PMid:33620586 PMCid:PMC8005399
Kavitt RT, Lipowska AM, Anyane-Yeboa A, Gralnek IM. (2019). Diagnosis and Treatment of Peptic Ulcer Disease. The American journal of medicine. 132(4): 447-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.12.009; PMid:30611829
Kozlov SN. (1998). An assessment of the prognostic criteria for early recurrences of peptic hemorrhage. Lik Sprava. 1: 137-139.
Lanas A, Chan FKL. (2017). Peptic ulcer disease. Lancet (London, England). 390(10094): 613-624. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32404-7; PMid:28242110
Laursen SB, Hansen JM, Hallas J, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB. (2015). The excess long-term mortality in peptic ulcer bleeding is explained by nonspecific comorbidity. Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. 50(2): 145-152. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365521.2014.992365; PMid:25540986
Nelms DW, Pelaez CA. (2018). The Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed. The Surgical clinics of North America. 98(5): 1047-1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2018.05.004; PMid:30243446
Saldaña Dueñas C, Elosua González A, Guerra Lacunza A. (2018). Gastric ischemia due to critical stenosis of the celiac trunk. Gastric ischemia due to critical stenosis of the celiac trunk. Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra. 41(1): 123-127. https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0248; PMid:29582857
Salman MA, Issa M, Salman A, Tourky M, Elewa A, Alrahawy M et al. (2022). Surgical Management of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Comparative Meta-analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery. Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques. 32(5): 586-594. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001086; PMid:36044274
Søreide K, Thorsen K, Harrison EM, Bingener J, Møller MH, Ohene-Yeboah M, Søreide JA. (2015). Perforated peptic ulcer. Lancet (London, England). 386(10000): 1288-1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7; PMid:26460663
Suzuki S, Esaki M, Kusano C, Ikehara H, Gotoda T. (2019). Development of Helicobacter pylori treatment: How do we manage antimicrobial resistance? World journal of gastroenterology. 25(16): 1907-1912. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i16.1907; PMid:31086459 PMCid:PMC6487377
Wang A, Yerxa J, Agarwal S, Turner MC, Schroder V, Youngwirth LM et al. (2020). Surgical management of peptic ulcer disease. Current problems in surgery. 57(2): 100728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpsurg.2019.100728; PMid:32138833
Yen HH, Wu PY, Wu TL, Huang SP, Chen YY, Chen MF et al. (2022). Forrest Classification for Bleeding Peptic Ulcer: A New Look at the Old Endoscopic Classification. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) 12(5): 1066. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051066; PMid:35626222 PMCid:PMC9139956
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Paediatric Surgery (Ukraine)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The policy of the Journal “PAEDIATRIC SURGERY. UKRAINE” is compatible with the vast majority of funders' of open access and self-archiving policies. The journal provides immediate open access route being convinced that everyone – not only scientists - can benefit from research results, and publishes articles exclusively under open access distribution, with a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 international license(СС BY-NC).
Authors transfer the copyright to the Journal “PAEDIATRIC SURGERY.UKRAINE” when the manuscript is accepted for publication. Authors declare that this manuscript has not been published nor is under simultaneous consideration for publication elsewhere. After publication, the articles become freely available on-line to the public.
Readers have the right to use, distribute, and reproduce articles in any medium, provided the articles and the journal are properly cited.
The use of published materials for commercial purposes is strongly prohibited.
