Surgical treatment of congenital anorectal malformation with rectovesical fistula in boys

Authors

  • O.Р. Dzham Center for neonatal surgery for malformations and their rehabilitation SI «Institute of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology named after academician O.M. Lukyanova of the NAMS of Ukraine», Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0271-2936

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15574/PS.2024.82.62

Keywords:

congenital anorectal malformation, rectovesical fistula, congenital pouch colon, associated malformations, surgical tactics, posterior sagittal anorectoplasty, longitudinal coloplasty, narrowing coloplasty, stapled coloplasty, children, boys

Abstract

Congenital rectovesical fistula (RVF) is the most complex variant of anorectal malformations (ARM) in boys, characterized by a fistula connecting the rectum with the bladder.

Purpose - to evaluate the results of surgical correction of RVF in children, using a differentiated approach to the diagnosis of this defect, depending on the anatomical options, the clinical course of associated defects, and, based on this, to develop the main tactical requirements for the treatment of this complex congenital ARM in children.

Materials and methods. The study included 9 boys: 7 - RVF without pouch colon and 2 - RVF with congenital pouch colon, which accounted for 5.8% of all treated anorectal anomalies (n=154).

Results. In patients with RVF without pouch colon: a double-stem disconnecting colostomy was performed in 3 (33.3%) and a double-stem loop colostomy in 4 (44.4%) boys. In children with RVF and pouch colon: a longitudinal, narrowing, stapler coloplasty of the large intestinal "pouch" was performed, with removal of the terminal stoma (n=1); formation of a double-stem disconnecting stoma without separation of the RVF, and at the II stage - elimination of the RVF, removal of the large intestinal «bag» and preservation of the ileostomy - as a permanent, lifelong stoma (n=1). In 7 (100%) patients with RVF without pouch colon at the II stage, abdomino-perineal posterosagittal anorectoplasty with separation of RVF was performed (n=5). At the III stage, 5 patients with RVF without a pouch colon underwent local access stoma closure. At the stages of primary correction of RVF 55.6% (n=5) of children had coloproctological complications.

Conclusions. The use of a differentiated approach to diagnosis and methods of anorectoplasty, as well as the use of a complex of rehabilitation treatment in patients with RVF without a pouch colon made it possible to obtain good results in 50% and satisfactory results in 50% of children. Congenital pouch colon - a significant expansion of part or the entire colon already in the fetus, makes it possible to suspect and diagnose this defect in the prenatal period, and to carry out delivery and surgical correction in a specialized perinatal center.

The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The research protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of the institution mentioned in the work. Informed consent of the patients was obtained for the research.

No conflict of interests was declared by the author.

References

Aggarwal S, Aggarwal A, Ded KS. (2017). Primary single stage repair of newborn babies with pouch colon (anorectal malformation) in a tertiary setup. Int. Surg J. 4(4): 1158-1162. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20170894

Bischoff A, Peña A, Levitt MA. (2013). Laparoscopic-assisted PSARP - the advantages of combining both techniques for the treatment of anorectal malformations with recto-bladderneck or high prostatic fistulas. J. Pediatr. Surg. 48: 367-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.11.019; PMid:23414867

Currarino G. (1996). The various types of anorectal fistula in male imperforate anus. J. Pediatr. Radiol. 26: 512-522. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01372231; PMid:8753661

Diao M, Li L, Ye M, Cheng W. (2014). Single-incision laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty using conventional instruments for children with anorectal malformations and rectourethral or rectovesical fistula. J. Pediatr. Surg. 49: 1689-1694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.08.010; PMid:25475820

Ghritlaharey RK, Srivastava J. (2011). A single stage procedure for congenital pouch colon and its complications. J. of Clin. and Diagn. Research. 5(1): 114-116.

Goossens WJH, de Blaauw I, Wijnen MH, Gier RPE et al. (2011). Urological anomalies in anorectal malformations in The Netherlands: effects of screening all patients on long-term outcome. J. Pediatr. Surg Int. 27: 1091-1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-011-2959-4; PMid:21805172 PMCid:PMC3175030

Gupta DK, Sharma S. (2007). Congenital pouch colon - then and now. J. Indian. Assoc. Pediatr. Surg. 12(1): 5-12. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-9261.31081

Holschneider AM, Hutson JM. (2006). Anorectal malformations in children. Embryology, Diagnosis, Surgical Treatment, Followup. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: 480.

Isa H, Miyagi H, Ishii D, Hirasawa M. (2021). Case of laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty performed with temporary umbilical loop colostomy for high anorectal malformation (rectovesical fistula): a three-stage minimally invasive surgery. BMJ Case Rep. 14(2): e240389. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2020-240389; PMid:33541957 PMCid:PMC7868190

Jahangiri F, Salek M, Javad Nasiri J, Lotfollahzadeh S et al. (2019). Congenital pouch colon with anorectal malformation: A report of one case. World J. of Surg. and Surg. Res. 2; Article 1096: 1-2.

Kennedy U, Daugherty M, Frischer J, De Foor W. (2023). Reoperative аnorectal рrocedures in рatients with anorectal malformations - is bladder function affected? J. Pediatr. Surg. 58(10): 1910-1915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.04.015; PMid:37217362

Lopez M, Kalfa N, Allal H, Guibal MP et al. (2014). Anorectal malformation with bladder fistula: advantages of a laparoscopic approach. Eur. J. Pediatr. Surg. 24(4): 3-4. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-965507; PMid:19517355

Mahmood SS, Zain AZ, Aboalhab RJ. (2015). Congenital pouch colon: A rare presentation of anorectal malformation. J. Fac. Med. Baghdad. 57(3): 193-197. https://doi.org/10.32007/jfacmedbagdad.573359

Mirza B, Ahmad S, Sheikh A. (2012). Congenital pouch colon: a preliminary report from Pakistan. J. Neonat. Surg. 1(3): 37.

Niaz S, Naz S, Razig RA. (2022). Congenital pouch colon in a neonate. Pak. J. Med Sci. 38(2): 426-429. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.ICON-2022.5771; PMid:35310792 PMCid:PMC8899889

Pena A. (1995). Anorectal malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg. 4: 35-47.

Pettersson Borg H. (2013). Bladder and bowel dysfunction in children with anorectal malformations. Institute of Clinical Sciences at Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg, Sweden: 68.

Sing S, Rawat J. (2018). Congenital pouch colon: our experience with coloplasty. African J. Pediatr Surg. 15(1): 16-21. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajps.AJPS_88_16; PMid:30829303 PMCid:PMC6419546

Solanki S, Menon P, Nayak S, Samujh R et al. (2020). Type IV congenital pouch colon in male children: fnatomical variations and a proposed new subclassification. J. Indian. Assoc. Pediatr. Surg. 25(1): 10-14. https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_189_18; PMid:31896893 PMCid:PMC6910055

Stephens FD, Smith ED, Pauol NW. (1988). Anorectal malformations in children; update. March Dimes Birth Defect Foundation. Original series. New York. 24(4): 1352-1361.

Strine AC, VanderBrink BA, Alam Z, Schulte M et al. (2017). Clinical and urodynamic outcomes in children with anorectal malformation subtype of recto-bladder neck fistula. J. Pediatr. Urol. 13(4): 376.e1-376.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.06.008; PMid:28733158

Van der Steeg HJ, Botden SM, Sloots CE et al. (2016). Outcome in anorectal malformation type rectovesical fistula: a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands. J. Pediatr. Surg. 51(8): 1229-1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.02.002; PMid:26921937

Published

2024-03-28

Issue

Section

Original articles. Coloproctology