Morphofunctional characteristics of the wound process during the treatment of purulous-necrotic wounds in rats with modern antiseptic means and collagenase

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15574/PS.2024.3(84).2230

Keywords:

purulent wound, wound process, collagenase, morphological changes, granulation tissue, blood vessels, leukocytes

Abstract

Infected and purulent wounds remain both a medical and economic challenge for the healthcare system today. Scientific and practical interest leads to the use of collagenase enzyme in wound care products.

Aim: to study and evaluate morphological changes in the wound process during the treatment of purulent-necrotic wounds in rats with drugs based on modern antiseptics and collagenase.

Materials and methods. The object of study: purulent-necrotic wounds. The experimental study was performed on 64 white laboratory rats. The simulated wound was contaminated with a pathogenic strain of S. aureus in combination with P. aeruginosa. Rats were divided into 4 groups of 16 animals each: I - control group (without treatment); II - collagenase-based gel with myramistin was used to treat the wound; III - ointment based on chloramphenicol and methyluracil; IV - myramistin-based ointment. 2 days after the start of the experiment, the drug and an aseptic gauze bandage were applied to the wound surface of animals of the II, III and IV groups, in the control group - only an aseptic bandage was applied. The dressing was changed daily for 14 days in all animals. Tissues were collected for histological and morphometric examination by excision of a fragment of skin with underlying tissues from the location of the wound defect followed by fixation in a 10% solution of neutral buffered formalin. The prepared histological sections with a thickness of 4 μm were stained with hematoxylin and eosin.

Results. It was found that in the II group, where collagenase was used, the number of leukocyte elements at the bottom of the wound defect from the 3rd day was significantly lower than in other groups. At the same time, the vascular component progressively increased. The obtained data correlate with the results of a histological examination: a faster reduction of the inflammatory process and the development of epithelialization. Complete coverage of the wound surface with the newly formed epithelium occurred already on the 10th day.

Conclusion. The obtained data indicate the appropriateness of collagenase in the treatment of purulent wounds not only as an enzymatic debridement, but as a substrance affecting important aspects in the first and second phases of the wound process.

The experiments with laboratory animals were provided in accordance with all bioethical norms and guidelines.

No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.

References

Alipour H, Raz A, Zakeri S, Djadid ND. (2016). Therapeutic applications of collagenase (metalloproteases): A review. Asian pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine. 6: 975-981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtb.2016.07.017

Andersen BM. (2018). Prevention of Postoperative Wound Infections. Prevention and Control of Infections in Hospitals: Practice and Theory. 453-489. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99921-0_33; PMCid:PMC7122543

Brocke T, Barr J. (2020). The History of Wound Healing. The Surgical clinics of North America. 100(4): 787-806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2020.04.004; PMid:32681877

Global Surg Collaborative. (2018). Surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: a prospective, international, multicentre cohort study. The Lancet. Infectious diseases. 18(5): 516-525. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30101-4; PMid:29452941

Guest JF, Fuller GW, Vowden P. (2020). Cohort study evaluating the burden of wounds to the UK's National Health Service in 2017/2018: update from 2012/2013. BMJ open. 10(12): e045253. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045253; PMid:33371051 PMCid:PMC7757484

Guest JF, Vowden K, Vowden P. (2017). The health economic burden that acute and chronic wounds impose on an average clinical commissioning group/health board in the UK. Journal of wound care. 26(6): 292-303. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2017.26.6.292; PMid:28598761

Gushiken LFS, Beserra FP, Bastos JK, Jackson CJ, Pellizzon CH. (2021). Cutaneous Wound Healing: An Update from Physiopathology to Current Therapies. Life (Basel, Switzerland). 11(7): 665. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11070665; PMid:34357037 PMCid:PMC8307436

Halim AS, Khoo TL, Saad AZ. (2012). Wound bed preparation from a clinical perspective. Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. 45(2): 193-202. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.101277; PMid:23162216 PMCid:PMC3495367

Han G, Ceilley R. (2017). Chronic Wound Healing: A Review of Current Management and Treatments. Advances in therapy. 34(3): 599-610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-017-0478-y; PMid:28108895 PMCid:PMC5350204

Hrynyshyn A, Simões M, Borges A. (2022). Biofilms in Surgical Site Infections: Recent Advances and Novel Prevention and Eradication Strategies. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland). 11(1): 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11010069; PMid:35052946 PMCid:PMC8773207

Karppinen SM, Heljasvaara R, Gullberg D, Tasanen K, Pihlajaniemi T. (2019). Toward understanding scarless skin wound healing and pathological scarring. F1000Research. 8: F1000. Faculty Rev-787. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18293.1; PMid:31231509 PMCid:PMC6556993

McCallon SK, Weir D, Lantis JC 2nd. (2015). Optimizing Wound Bed Preparation With Collagenase Enzymatic Debridement. The journal of the American College of Clinical Wound Specialists. 6(1-2): 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jccw.2015.08.003; PMid:26442207 PMCid:PMC4566869

Niederstätter IM, Schiefer JL, Fuchs PC. (2021). Surgical Strategies to Promote Cutaneous Healing. Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland). 9(2): 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci9020045; PMid:34208722 PMCid:PMC8293365

Olsson M, Järbrink K, Divakar U, Bajpai R, Upton Z, Schmidtchen A, Car J. (2019). The humanistic and economic burden of chronic wounds: A systematic review. Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. 27(1): 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12683; PMid:30362646

Payne WG, Salas RE, Ko F, Naidu DK, Donate G, Wright TE, Robson MC. (2008). Enzymatic debriding agents are safe in wounds with high bacterial bioburdens and stimulate healing. Eplasty. 8: e17.

Ramundo J, Gray M. (2009). Collagenase for enzymatic debridement: a systematic review. Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. 36; 6 Suppl: S4-S11. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e3181bfdf83; PMid:19918148

Reinke JM, Sorg H. (2012). Wound repair and regeneration. European surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes. 49(1): 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1159/000339613; PMid:22797712

Sen CK. (2021). Human Wound and Its Burden: Updated 2020 Compendium of Estimates. Advances in wound care. 10(5): 281-292. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2021.0026; PMid:33733885 PMCid:PMC8024242

Wilkinson HN, Hardman MJ. (2020). Wound healing: cellular mechanisms and pathological outcomes. Open biology. 10(9): 200223. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.200223; PMid:32993416 PMCid:PMC7536089

Published

2024-09-28

Issue

Section

Original articles. General surgery