Comparative analysis of the use of 3D navigation and «free hand» technique in the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in children

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15574/PS.2025.2(87).5257

Keywords:

idiopathic scoliosis, spinal deformity, “free hand” technique, pedicle screw, spinal surgery safety, posterior instrumentation, 3D navigation, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring

Abstract

Posterior instrumentation technique and posterior fusion with pedicle screws is a standard operation for the correction of idiopathic scoliosis. Pedicle screws can be incorrectly placed even by the best, most experienced surgeons (1.7 to 15% of cases). Improving the accuracy of screw insertion can be achieved by using standardized methods of free-hand technique screw insertion and by using navigation systems

Aim - to determine the benefits of using optical enhancement technique with navigation based on intraoperative computed tomography is more effective than the free-hand technique in the placement of pedicle screws in the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in children.

Materials and methods. The study included 90 patients with a diagnosis of idiopathic scoliosis of the thoracolumbar spine. A total of 2127 pedicle screws were inserted during the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in children. The group A included 44 patients, who received 1059 pedicle screws using the «free-hand» technique. The group B included 46 patients, who received 1068 pedicle screws using 3D-navigation with optical amplification. The accuracy of screw placement was assessed on postoperative CT scans using the Gertzbein-Robbins scale. We compared the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement between the both groups.

Results. The group A's rate of 90.1% was significantly lower than that of the group B's 96.5%.

Conclusions. Intraoperative computer 3D-navigation compared to the “freehand” technique has the advantage of correctness and safety of pedicle screw placement, shortens surgical time, reduce intraoperative bleeding, the number of neurological postoperative complications, and also ensure the safety of the operation by identifying and quickly removing an incorrectly placed screw. Increasing the accuracy of screw placement allows for an increase in the range of surgical interventions of higher complexity and improving the correction rates of spinal deformities in idiopathic scoliosis in children.

The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee for all participants. The informed consent of the patients was obtained for the study.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author Biographies

K.S. Kurysko, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv

National Specialized Children's Hospital «OKHMATDYT», Kyiv, Ukraine

A.F. Levytskyi, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv

National Specialized Children's Hospital «OKHMATDYT», Kyiv, Ukraine

References

Baldwin KD, Kadiyala M, Talwar D, Sankar WN, Flynn JJM, Anari JB. (2022. Jan). Does intraoperative CT navigation increase the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in pediatric spinal deformity surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine Deform. 10(1): 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-021-00385-5; PMid:34251607

Berlin C, Platz U, Quante M, Thomsen B, Köszegvary M, Halm H. (2020, Aug). Collected data on freehand technique instrumentation and literature comparison on fluoroscopic and CT-assisted navigation. Orthopade. 49(8): 724-731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-020-03896-7; PMid:32112224

Berlin C, Quante M, Thomsen B, Köszegvary M, Platz U, Halm H. (2021, Aug). Intraoperative Radiation Exposure for Patients with Double-Curve Idiopathic Scoliosis in Freehand-Technique in Comparison to Fluoroscopic- and CT-Based Navigation Z Orthop Unfall. 159(4): 412-420. Epub 2020 May 4. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1121-8033; PMid:32365396

Elmi-Terander A, Burström G, Nachabé R, Fagerlund M, Ståhl F, Charalampidis A et al. (2020, Jan 20). Augmented reality navigation with intraoperative 3D imaging vs fluoroscopy-assisted free-hand surgery for spine fixation surgery: a matched-control study comparing accuracy. Sci Rep. 10(1): 707. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-57693-5; PMid:31959895 PMCid:PMC6971085

Hicks JM, Singla A, Shen FH et al. (2010, May 15). Comparison of pedicle screw fixation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 35(11): E465-470. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d1021a; PMid:20473117

Joglekar SB, Mehbod AA. (2012, Dec). Surgeon's view of pedicle screw implantation for the monitoring neurophysiologist. J Clin Neurophysiol. 29(6): 482-488. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0b013e3182768091; PMid:23207586

Karapinar L, Erel N, Ozturk H, Altay T, Kaya A. (2008, Feb). Pedicle screw placement with a free hand technique in thoracolumbar spine: is it safe? J Spinal Disord Tech. 21(1): 63-67. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181453dc6; PMid:18418139

Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Cho YS, Riew KD. (2004, Feb 1). Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 29(3): 333-342; discussion 342. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000109983.12113.9B; PMid:14752359

Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, O'Brien MF et al. (2005, Jan 15). Accuracy and efficiency of thoracic pedicle screws in bends greater than 90 degrees. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 30(2): 222-226. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000150482.26918.d8; PMid:15644761

Ledonio CGT, Polly DW, Jr, Jones KE, Zhu HW. (2015). Pedicle Screw Placement Using 3D Navigation: How Long Does it Take?. The Spine Journal. 15; 10: 247. URL: https://www.thespinejournalonline.com/article/S1529-9430(15)01052-9/abstract. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.373

Levytskyi AF, Burianov OA, Benzar IM, Omelchenko TM, Ovdii MO. (2022). Tactics of surgical treatment of congenital spinal deformities in children. Paediatric Surgery (Ukraine). 2(75): 26-30. https://doi.org/10.15574/PS.2022.75.26

Liljenqvist UR, Link TM, Halm HF. (2000, May 15). Morphometric analysis of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 25(10): 1247-53. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200005150-00008; PMid:10806501

Manbachi A, Cobbold RS, Ginsberg HJ. Guided pedicle screw insertion: techniques and training. Spine J. 2014 Jan;14(1):165-79. Epub 2013 Apr 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.029; PMid:23623511

Mason A, Paulsen R, Babuska JM, Rajpal S, Burneikiene S et al. (2014, Feb). The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative image guidance systems. J Neurosurg Spine. 20(2): 196-203. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.11.SPINE13413; PMid:24358998

Mezentsev AO, Petrenko DS, Demchenko DO. (2023). Surgical correction of congenital kyphosis in children. Clinical case. Paediatric Surgery (Ukraine). 1(78): 135-139. https://doi.org/10.15574/PS.2023.78.135

Samdani AF, Ranade A, Saldanha V, Yondorf MZ. (2010, Feb). Learning curve for placement of thoracic pedicle screws in the deformed spine. Neurosurgery. 66(2): 290-294; discussion 294-295. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000363853.62897.94; PMid:20087128

Shi X, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Cui G, Mao K, Wang Z et al. (2012 Dec). Application of intraoperative CT navigation in posterior thoracic pedicle screw placement for scoliosis patients. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 26(12): 1415-1419. PMID: 23316627.

Urbanski W, Jurasz W, Wolanczyk M, Kulej M, Morasiewicz P, Dragan SL et al. (2018, May).. Increased Radiation but No Benefits in Pedicle Screw Accuracy With Navigation versus a Freehand Technique in Scoliosis Surgery. Clin Orthop RelatRes. 476(5): 1020-1027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999.0000000000000204; PMid:29432262 PMCid:PMC5916595

Youssef S, McDonnell JM, Wilson KV, Turley L, Cunniffe G, Morris S et al. (2024, Mar).. Accuracy of augmented reality-assisted pedicle screw placement: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 33(3): 974-984. Epub 2024 Jan 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-08094-5; PMid:38177834

Published

2025-06-28

Issue

Section

Original articles. Orthopedics