Principles of anatomical reconstruction of the pelvic floor during surgical treatment of congenital malformations – sacrococcygeal teratoma in children (literature analysis and own recommendations)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15574/PS.2025.3(88).123127Keywords:
congenital malformations, sacrococcygeal teratoma, fetus, newborn child, older child, perinatal support, surgical treatmentAbstract
Aim - to identify key factors and basic principles of surgical technique that influence the functional outcome in the reconstruction of pelvic floor structures during the surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal teratomas (SCT) in children.
The literature review was conducted using PubMed, Elsevier, and textbooks. Key factors influencing the functional outcome of pelvic floor structure restoration during surgical treatment of pelvic floor tumors were identified. Specific changes in the sacrococcygeal region caused by tumor growth were described. Ways to optimize surgical technique for anatomical restoration of pelvic floor structures after pelvic floor tumor resection in children were analyzed. The anatomical type of the tumor, the severity of the growth of the SCT, the degree of pathological influence and germination into the surrounding structures, the severity of dysplastic changes in the musculoskeletal and nervous system are key factors that affect the functional outcome in the reconstruction of pelvic floor structures and determine the individual differentiated strategy in the surgical removal of SCT.
Gentle anatomical dissection of the teratoma within the tumor capsule, maximum preservation of nerves and muscle fibers, identification of altered anatomical structures, and reconstruction of their normal anatomy, respectively, are the main principles of the surgical technique for anatomical reconstruction of the pelvic floor in the surgical treatment of SCT.
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
References
AbouZeid AA, Mohamed MH, Dahab MM, GadAllah MA, Zaki AM. (2017). Sacrococcygeal teratoma excision: a vertical rather than transverse wound closure. Ann Pediatric Surg. 13: 207-212. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.XPS.0000521797.51003.b2
Bougie E, Padeanu S, Plourde C, Aspirot A, Bouchard S et al. (2023, Apr 18). It is all about form and function: a new approach to giant neonatal sacrococcygeal teratomas. Pediatr Surg Int. 39(1): 182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-023-05454-6; PMid:37071222
Braungart S, James EC, Powis M, Gabra H et al. (2023, Jan). Sacrococcygeal teratoma: Long-term outcomes. A UK CCLG Surgeons Group Nationwide Study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 70(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.29994; PMid:36229941
Çalbiyik M, Zehir S. (2023, Jun 30). Teratomas from past to the present: A scientometric analysis with global productivity and research trends between 1980 and 2022. Medicine (Baltimore). 102(26): e34208. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034208; PMid:37390229 PMCid:PMC10313264
Eickmeyer SM. (2017, Aug). Anatomy and Physiology of the Pelvic Floor. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 28(3): 455-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2017.03.003; PMid:28676358
Fishman SJ, Jennings RW, Johnson SM, Kim HB. (2004, Mar). Contouring buttock reconstruction after sacrococcygeal teratoma resection. J Pediatr Surg. 39(3): 439-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2003.11.036; PMid:15017566
Fumino S, Hirohata Y, Takayama S, Tajiri T, Usui N, Taguchi T et al. (2024, Apr). Long-Term Outcomes of Infantile Sacrococcygeal Teratoma: Results from a Multi-Institutional Retrospective Observational Study in Japan. J Pediatr Surg. 59(4): 587-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.11.016; PMid:38158258
Gross RE, Clatworthy HW, Meeker IA. (1951). Sacrococcygeal teratomas in infants and children: A report of 40 cases. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 92: 341-353.
Handschin AE, Mackowski M, Vogt PM, Peters T. (2010). A new technique for gluteal lifting using deepithelialized dermal flaps. Aesth Plast Surg. 34: 96-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-009-9447-4; PMid:20043157
Hasan S, Çeltik Ü, Şakul G, Çelik A, Ergün MO. (2024, Sep 26). Germ Cell Neoplasms of Sacrococcygeal Region: Clinical Characteristics, Outcomes and Analysis of Recurrence after Treatment; A Comprehensive 20-Year Single Center Study. J Pediatr Res. 11(3): 149-154. https://doi.org/10.4274/jpr.galenos.2024.83669
Hyrtl J. (1880). Onomatologia Anatomica. Geschichte und Kritik der anatomischen Sprache der Gegenwart. Wien: Wilhelm Braumüller. K.K. Hof- und Universitätsbuchhändler.
Jouzova A, Jouza M, Turek J, Gerychova R, Jezova M et al. (2025, Apr 23). Sacrococcygeal teratoma - prognosis based on prenatal ultrasound diagnosis, single-center experience and literature review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 25(1): 469. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07494-3; PMid:40269769 PMCid:PMC12016376
Kayalioglu G. (2009). The Spinal Nerves. Chapter 4. In: The Spinal Cord. Editor(s): Charles Watson, George Paxinos, Gulgun Kayalioglu. Academic Press: 37-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374247-6.50008-0
Kraus LA. (1844). Kritisch-etymologisches medicinisches Lexikon (Dritte Auflage). Göttingen: Verlag der Deuerlich- und Dieterichschen Buchhandlung.
Kylat RI, Bader M. (2020, Nov 4). Caudal Regression Syndrome. Children (Basel). 7(11): 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/children7110211; PMid:33158301 PMCid:PMC7694368
Masahata K, Ichikawa C, Makino K, Abe T, Kim K, Yamamichi T et al. (2020, Nov). Long-term functional outcome of sacrococcygeal teratoma after resection in neonates and infants: a single-center experience. Pediatr Surg Int. 36(11): 1327-1332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-020-04752-7; PMid:32990839
Mosleh MM, Heo TG, Shin HB, Sohn MJ. (2023, Jan). Sacrococcygeal teratomas: a case-based review from the perspective of individual multidisciplinary experts. Childs Nerv Syst. 39(1): 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-022-05768-1; PMid:36422695
Mostafa E, Varacallo MA. (2023, Jun 5). Anatomy, Back, Coccygeal Vertebrae. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. PMID: 31751060.
Paulino AC, Mazloom A, Terashima K, Su J, Adesina AM, Okcu MF et al. (2013, Jul 15). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in pediatric low-grade glioma. Cancer. 119(14): 2654-2659. Epub 2013 Apr 30. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28118; PMid:23633429
Phi JH. (2021, May). Sacrococcygeal Teratoma: A Tumor at the Center of Embryogenesis. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 64(3): 406-413. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2021.0015; PMid:33906346 PMCid:PMC8128526
Puri P, Höllwarth ME. (Eds.). (2019). Pediatric Surgery. Springer Surgery Atlas Series: 440. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56282-6
Raizada V, Mittal RK. (2008, Sep). Pelvic floor anatomy and applied physiology. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 37(3): 493-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gtc.2008.06.003; PMid:18793993 PMCid:PMC2617789
Shalaby MS, Dorris L, Carachi R. (2014). The long-term psychosocial outcomes following excision of sacrococcygeal teratoma: a national study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 99: F149-152. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-304901; PMid:24277662
Shue E, Bolouri M, Jelin EB, Vu L, Bratton B, Cedars E et al. (2013). Tumor metrics and morphology predict poor prognosis in prenatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratoma: a 25-year experience at a single institution. J Pediatr Surg. 48: 1225-1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.03.016; PMid:23845611
Sugar O. (1995). Coccyx. The bone named for a bird. Spine. 20: 379-383. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199502000-00024; PMid:7732478
Taguchi T. (2019, Jul). Sacrococcygeal teratoma: Nationwide survey and guidelines. Pediatr Int. 61(7): 633. https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.13933; PMid:31359538
Van Mieghem T, Al-Ibrahim A, Deprest J, Lewi L, Langer JC, Baud D et al. (2014), Minimally invasive therapy for fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma: case series and systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 43: 611-619. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13315; PMid:24488859
Wang Y, Wu Y, Wang L, Yuan X, Jiang M, Li Y. (2017, Jan 2). Analysis of Recurrent Sacrococcygeal Teratoma in Children: Clinical Features, Relapse Risks, and Anorectal Functional Sequelae. Med Sci Monit. 23: 17-23. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.900400; PMid:28042962 PMCid:PMC5223781
Woon JT, Stringer MD. (2012, Mar). Clinical anatomy of the coccyx: A systematic review. Clin Anat. 25(2): 158-167. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.21216; PMid:21739475
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Paediatric Surgery (Ukraine)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The policy of the Journal “PAEDIATRIC SURGERY. UKRAINE” is compatible with the vast majority of funders' of open access and self-archiving policies. The journal provides immediate open access route being convinced that everyone – not only scientists - can benefit from research results, and publishes articles exclusively under open access distribution, with a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 international license(СС BY-NC).
Authors transfer the copyright to the Journal “PAEDIATRIC SURGERY.UKRAINE” when the manuscript is accepted for publication. Authors declare that this manuscript has not been published nor is under simultaneous consideration for publication elsewhere. After publication, the articles become freely available on-line to the public.
Readers have the right to use, distribute, and reproduce articles in any medium, provided the articles and the journal are properly cited.
The use of published materials for commercial purposes is strongly prohibited.
