Anatomical features of diaphragmatic defects of various sizes and their significance in congenital diaphragmatic hernia in newborns

Authors

  • O.K. Sliepov Center for Neonatal Surgery of Developmental Defects and Their Rehabilitation SI «Ukrainian center of maternity and childhood of the NAMS of Ukraine», Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6976-1209
  • K.L. Znak Center for Neonatal Surgery of Developmental Defects and Their Rehabilitation SI «Ukrainian center of maternity and childhood of the NAMS of Ukraine», Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8370-4390

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15574/PS.2025.4(89).1520

Keywords:

congenital diaphragmatic hernia, congenital diaphragmatic defect, its anatomical features, prognosis, fetus, newborn baby

Abstract

Studying the anatomical characteristics of diaphragmatic defects of various types and sizes in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is crucial for improving surgical strategies and optimizing treatment for these patients.

Aim - to analyze the anatomical features of diaphragmatic defects of varying sizes in CDH in newborns as a key factor in developing surgical strategies for this congenital malformation.

Materials and methods. We analyzed the anatomical features of diaphragmatic defects of varying sizes in 58 newborns with CDH who were treated between 2013 and 2025. Depending on the size of the diaphragmatic defect, newborns with CD were divided into 2 groups: Group I - 38 (65.5%) infants with small and medium-sized diaphragmatic defects (types A and B), Group II - 20 (34.5%) patients with large and total diaphragmatic defects (types C and D). The following were examined intraoperatively: the side and location of the diaphragmatic defect, the presence of a hernial sac, and the nature of the hernial contents. Herniation was assessed: loops of the small and large intestines, stomach, spleen, pancreas (partially or completely), left/right kidney, liver (partially or completely), greater omentum, gallbladder. Particular attention was paid to the presence of a posterior rim of the diaphragmatic defect.

Results. The mean area of the diaphragmatic defect in patients in Group II was significantly larger than in Group I. No significant differences were found between the groups in the frequency of hernial sac presence or the frequency of left-sided and right-sided diaphragmatic defects. Posterior-lateral localization of the defect was significantly more common in patients in Group I. Posterior-medial localization was observed predominantly in patients in Group II. Partial or complete herniation of the liver and stomach into the thoracic cavity was significantly more common in patients in Group II.

Conclusions. In diaphragmatic defects of types A and B, the location of the CDH is significantly more often posterolateral. The size of the diaphragmatic defect did not influence the side of the CDH, nor the anatomical features of its posterior muscular rim. In large and total diaphragmatic defects, herniation of the stomach and liver into the thoracic cavity occurs significantly more frequently. Studying the anatomical features of diaphragmatic defects of various types and sizes in CDH is of great importance for optimizing the surgical treatment of this critical developmental defect.

The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee of the aforementioned institution. Informed consent was obtained from patients for the study.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Chatterjee D, Ing RJ, Gien J. (2020, Sep). Update on Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia. Anesth Analg. 131(3): 808-821. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000004324; PMid:31335403

Cordier AG, Russo FM, Deprest J, Benachi A. (2020, Feb). Prenatal diagnosis, imaging, and prognosis in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia. Semin Perinatol. 44(1): 51163. Epub 2019 Jul 30. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2019.07.002; PMid:31439324

Deprest J, Nicolaides K, Benachi A et al. (2019). Total fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion (FETO) for severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia: evolution of a technique and preliminary results. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 53(5): 611-620. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20120; PMid:30207001

Didier RA, Oliver ER, Rungsiprakarn P, Debari SE, Adams SE, Hedrick HL et al. (2021, Nov). Decreased neonatal morbidity in 'stomach-down' left congenital diaphragmatic hernia: implications of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis for counseling and postnatal management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 58(5): 744-749. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.23630; PMid:33724570

Dingeldein M, Fiegel H, Schaible T et al. (2019). Impact of defect size on outcome of congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair: results from the CDH Euro Consortium. Pediatr Surg Int. 35(5): 561-567. doi: 10.1007/s00383-019-04443-5.

Dumpa V, Chandrasekharan P. (2023, Aug 8). Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556076/.

Fraga MV, Hedrick HL, Rintoul NE, Wang Y, Ash D, Flohr SJ et al. (2024, Aug). Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Patients with Left Heart Hypoplasia and Left Ventricular Dysfunction Have Highest Odds of Mortality. J Pediatr. 271: 114061. Epub 2024 Apr 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114061; PMid:38636784 PMCid:PMC11239301

Hattori K, Takamizawa S, Miyake Y et al. (2018). Preoperative sonographic evaluation of the defect size and the diaphragm rim in congenital diaphragmatic hernia - preliminary experience. Pediatr Radiol. 48: 1550-1555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4184-y; PMid:29978294

Kitano Y, Nakagawa S, Kuroda T, Honna T, Itoh Y, Nakamura T et al. (2005, Dec). Liver position in fetal congenital diaphragmatic hernia retains a prognostic value in the era of lung-protective strategy. J Pediatr Surg. 40(12): 1827-1832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.08.020; PMid:16338299

Otaño JC, Murua V, Rugilo J, Reusmann A, Ruhrnschopf CG et al. (2024, Jul). Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: relationship between defect size and outcome. Experience in a reference centre. An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 101(1): 29-35. Epub 2024 Jul 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpede.2024.04.020; PMid:38971707

Tsao K, Lally KP. (2017). The Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group and advances in the clinical care of the patient with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Pediatr Surg. 26(3): 122-128. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2017.04.005; PMid:28641747

Yamoto M, Nagata K, Terui K, Hayakawa M, Okuyama H, Amari S et al. (2022, Jun 8). Long-Term Outcomes of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Report of a Multicenter Study in Japan. Children (Basel). 9(6): 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9060856; PMid:35740795 PMCid:PMC9222080

Zani A, Chung WK, Deprest J, Harting MT, Jancelewicz T, Kunisaki SM et al. (2022, Jun 1). Congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 8(1): 37. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-022-00362-w; PMid:35650272

Published

2025-12-28

Issue

Section

Original articles. Neonatal surgery