Use of prophylactic phytocylinders with a lipophilic complex of rose hips and chamomile extract for the anal fissures and constipation treatment in children

Authors

  • I. O. Kritskyi SHEI «Gorbachevskyi Ternopil State Medical University of MoH of Ukraine», Ternopil, Ukraine, Ukraine
  • P. V. Goshchinskyi SHEI «Gorbachevskyi Ternopil State Medical University of MoH of Ukraine», Ternopil, Ukraine, Ukraine
  • T. I. Kritskyi SHEI «Gorbachevskyi Ternopil State Medical University of MoH of Ukraine», Ternopil, Ukraine, Ukraine
  • T. O. Vorontsova SHEI «Gorbachevskyi Ternopil State Medical University of MoH of Ukraine», Ternopil, Ukraine, Ukraine
  • V. O. Synytska SHEI «Gorbachevskyi Ternopil State Medical University of MoH of Ukraine», Ternopil, Ukraine, Ukraine
  • I. M. Gorishnii SHEI «Gorbachevskyi Ternopil State Medical University of MoH of Ukraine», Ternopil, Ukraine, Ukraine
  • I. M. Vitenko SHEI «Gorbachevskyi Ternopil State Medical University of MoH of Ukraine», Ternopil, Ukraine, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15574/PS.2018.58.98

Keywords:

phytocylinders anal fissure, treatment, children

Abstract

Objective – to study the efficacy of prophylactic phytocylinders with a lipophilic complex of rose hips and chamomile extract (Scientific and Production LLC «Zhitomirbioprodukt») in children with anal fissures and constipation.
Material and methods. The comprehensive examination and treatment of 42 children with anal fissures and constipation were performed. The first group included 20 (47.6%) children who received the prophylactic phytocylinders with a lipophilic complex of rose hips and chamomile extract during 10 days every day in the form of rectal suppositories 1–2 times per day. The second group comprised 22 (52.4%) children who received standard treatment according to the protocol.
Results and conclusions. Against the background of the comprehensive treatment for anal fissures and constipation with the prophylactic phytocylinders with a lipophilic complex of rose hips and chamomile extract, there was a more pronounced treatment efficacy in comparison with basic therapy alone. This justifies the necessity of their use in children with this pathology.

References

Baranova AA, Klimanskoy EV, Rimarchuk GV. (redaktoryi). (2002). Detskaya gastroenterologiya (izbrannyie glavyi). Moskva.

Berdnikova EK, Keshishyan ES. (2007). Funktsionalnyie narusheniya zheludochno-kishechnogo trakta u detey rannego vozrasta. Consilium Medicum. Pediatriya. 9(1): 13–17.

Bielousov YuV, Voloshyna LH, Pavlenko NV, Solodovnychenko IH, Babadzhanian OM. (2007). Zakhvoriuvannia orhaniv travlennia u ditei (standarty diahnostyky ta likuvannia): navchalnyi posibnyk dlia pediatriv, dytiachykh hastroenterolohiv, likariv zahalnoi praktyky – simeinoi medytsyny. Kharkiv: INZhEK.

Maidannyk VH. (2007). Rymski kryterii III (2006) diahnostyky funktsionalnykh hastrointestynalnykh rozladiv u ditei. Pediatriia, akusherstvo ta hinekolohiia. 3: 5–13.

Barrett KE, Ghishan FK, Merchant JL, Said HM, Wood JD, Joh LR (Eds.). (2006). Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract. 2 vol. Set: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012088394-3/50079-9

Bassotti G, de Roberto G, Castellani D, Sediari L, Morelli A. (2005). Normal aspects of colorectal motility and abnormalities in slow transit constipation. World J Gastroenterol. 11 (18): 2691–2696.

Biggs WS, Dery WH. (2006). Evaluation and treatment of constipation in infants and children. Am. Fam. Physician. 73: 469–482.

Boccia G, Buonavolonta R, Coccorullo P et al. (2008). Dyspeptic symptoms in children: the result of a constipation-induced cologastric brake? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 6 (5): 556–560.

Issue

Section

Original articles. Coloproctology