Using prepucial mucous to cover neourethra in TIP urethroplasty: 4 years experience in a tertiary paediatric hospital of Bangladesh

Authors

  • Sabbir Karim Dhaka shishu Hospital & Bangladesh institute of child health, Bangladesh
  • Monoarul Islam Talukder ShSMC, Bangladesh
  • Sultana Parvin ShSMC, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15574/PS.2020.68.37

Keywords:

Hypospadias, TIP urethroplasty, Prepucial mucosa

Abstract

Background. Hypospadias has a wide spectrum of penile abnormality requiring surgical correction. Most of the cases are of anterior variety and the surgical technique depends on constructing a neo urethra. Snodgrass or Tubularized Incised Plate (TIP) urethroplasty is one of the most popular techniques of urethroplasty which depends on the existing healthy, adequate and intact urethral plate. Different tissues have been described to cover the neourethra as second layer in literature. In this study we modified the TIP urethroplasty by covering the neourethra with 2 layers of pedicled prepucial mucosa or Dartos flap.

Objective. To see the outcome of modified Snodgrass or TIP urethroplasty in anterior mid and proximal penile hypospadias.

Materials and method. Total 88 patients were operated by modified Snodgrass technique or modified TIP urethroplasty from January 2012 to July 2016. Coronal, subcoronal, distal penile, mid penile and proximal penile hypospadias were included in the study. Every patient underwent modified TIP urethroplasty and outcomes were assessed.

Results. The mean age of the patients were 28.34±14.98 months, ranges from 6.5 to 65 months. 9 (10.2%) patients of our series develop urethrocutaneous fistula, 5 (5.68%) patients develop meatal stenosis and 1 (1.1%) patient developed neourethral stricture.

Conclusion. TIP urethroplasty is a versatile method to correct penile hypospadias. Covering of the neourethra with prepucial mucosa secure the neourethral anastomosis.

References

Baskin LS, Ebbers MB. (2006). Hypospadias: Anatomy, etiology, and technique. J Pediatr Surg. 41: 463-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.11.059; PMid:16516617

Paulozzi L, Erickson D, Jackson. (1997). Hypospadias trends in two US surveillance systems. Pediatrics. 100: 831-834. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.100.5.831; PMid:9346983

Paulozzi L. (1999). International trends in rates of hypospadias and cryptorchidism. Environ Health Perspect. 107: 297-302. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.99107297; PMid:10090709 PMCid:PMC1566511

Alkan M, Oguzkurt P, Ezer SS, Ince E, Hicsonmez A. (2008). Evaluation of the results of eccentric circummeatal-based flap with combined limited urethral mobilization technique for distal hypospadias repair. J Pediatr Urol. 4: 206-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2007.11.008; PMid:18631927

Hamdy H, Awadhi MA, Rasromani KH. (1999). Urethral mobilization andmeatal advancement: a surgical principle in hypospadias repair. Pediatr Surg Int. 15: 240-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003830050566; PMid:10370034

Jayanthi VR. (2003). The modified Snodgrass hypospadias repair: reducing the risk of fistula and meatal stenosis. J Urol. 170: 1603-1605. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000085260.52825.73; PMid:14501672

Snodgrass W. (1994). Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias. J Urol. 151: 464-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)34991-1

Retik AB, Borer JG. (1998). Primary and reoperative hypospadias repair with the Snodgrass technique. World J Urol.16:186-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003450050050; PMid:9666542

Holland AJ, Smith GH, Cass DT. (2000). Clinical review of the Snodgrass hypospadias repair. Aust NZ J Surg. 70: 597-600. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01906.x; PMid:10945555

Dayanc. M, Tan MO, Gokalp A, Yıldırım L, Peker AF. (2000). Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for distal and mid-penile hypospadias. Eur Urol. 37: 102-5. https://doi.org/10.1159/000020108; PMid:10671794

Mehmet E, Gu.lay T, Serdar S. (2004). Tubularized Incised Plate Urethroplasty: 5 Years’ Experience. European Urology. 46: 655-659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2004.05.007; PMid:15474279

Snodgrass WT. (2005). Surgical Atlas Snodgrass technique for hypospadias repair, illustration by Stephan Spitzer. BJU international. 95: 683-693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05384.x; PMid:15705110

Snodgrass W. (1999). Does tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair create neourethral strictures. J Urol. 162: 1159-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199909000-00072; PMid:10458455

Elbakryl A. (1999). Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty: Is regular dilatation necessary for success? BJU Int. 84: 683-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00207.x; PMid:10510116

Lorenzo AJ, Snodgrass WT. (2002). Regular dilatation is unnecessary after tubularized-incised plate hypospadias repair. BJU Int. 89: 94-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.02519.x

Elbakryl A. (2002). Further experience with the tubularizedincised urethral plate technique for hypospadias repair. BJU Int. 89: 291-4. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.01525.x; PMid:11856113

Snodgrass WT, Nguyen MT. (2002). Current technique of tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair. Urology. 60: 157-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01620-5

Dhua AK, Agarwal S, Sinha S, Ratan SK. (2012, Mar). Soft tissue covers in hypospadias surgery: Is tunica vaginalis better than dartos flap? JIAPS. 17(1): 16-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-9261.91080; PMid:22279358 PMCid:PMC3263032

Baskin LS. (2010). Hypospadias. in: JA O'Neil, MI Rowe, JA Grossfield, EW Fankalsrud, AG Coran, editors.Pediatric Surgery, 7th edn. Missouri: Mosby year book: 1531-1553. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-07255-7.00121-5

Downloads

Published

2020-09-29

Issue

Section

Original articles. Urology and gynecology