Foreign objects in the stomach and intestines in children, a review of the literature and own clinical observations

Authors

  • V.F. Rybalchenko Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1872-6948
  • P.S. Rusak Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1267-0816
  • Yu.L. Voloshin KNP Zhytomyr Regional Children's Clinical Hospital, Ukraine
  • I.G. Rybalchenko PHEE "Kyiv Medical University", Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0634-2725
  • S.A. Braginska KNP Kyiv City Children's Clinical Hospital No. 1, Ukraine
  • A.S. Semenets KNP Kyiv City Children's Clinical Hospital No. 1, Ukraine
  • O.I. Khokhlov KNP Zhytomyr Regional Children's Clinical Hospital, Ukraine
  • S.V. Sagan Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • N.M. Dukova Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15574/PS.2026.1(90).125136

Keywords:

children, foreign objects of the gastrointestinal tract, diagnostics, treatment

Abstract

Ingestion of foreign inedible bodies is a common cause of visits to emergency departments in children, 75% of whom are children under 4 years of age. About 98% of foreign body ingestions are accidental.

Aim - to analyze current literature data and our own clinical observations on foreign objects in the stomach and intestines in children in order to improve diagnostics and choose the optimal treatment tactics.

In the clinical departments over 20 years, 57 patients aged from 1.5 to 17 were treated. Bezoars of the stomach and intestines in 12 (21.05%), of which trichobezoars in 7 (12.28%) and phytobezoars in 5 (8.77%), and were treated surgically. Intestinal magnets in 4 (7.02%), of which single ones in 2 (3.51%) came out naturally, and 2 (3.51%) were operated on. Batteries of the stomach and intestines in 8 (14.04%), of which 3 (5.27%) were removed endoscopically, and 5 (8.77%) came out naturally. Sewing needles in 9 (15.79%) and glass fragments in 4 (7.02%) came out naturally. A rectal balloon (lacquer) in 1 (1.75%) male patient was removed during an anaesthetic examination. Stomach and intestinal coins in 11 (19.30%), of which 1 (1.75%) was removed endoscopically, and 10 (17.54%) passed naturally. Toy fragments in 7 (12.28%) passed naturally. Rubber, glass, straw and cellophane fragments in the intestine in 1 (1.75%) patient were removed surgically against the background of intellectual impairment.

Conclusions. Our own studies showed that in 64.92% of children, foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract were evacuated naturally, while in 35.08% of cases, endoscopic or surgical removal was required. The presence of a history of complaints of swallowing foreign objects, regardless of the manifestations, requires a survey radiography of the chest and abdomen. Foreign objects of the button battery are subject to urgent removal. Two or more magnets that were swallowed not simultaneously are subject to removal without waiting for perforation and peritonitis.

The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from the children's parents.

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Author Biographies

V.F. Rybalchenko, Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine, Kyiv

PHEE "Kyiv Medical University", Ukraine

P.S. Rusak, Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine, Kyiv

KNP Zhytomyr Regional Children's Clinical Hospital, Ukraine

References

Altokhais T. (2021, Aug 4). Magnet Ingestion in Children Management Guidelines and Prevention. Front Pediatr. 9: 727988. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.727988; PMid:34422734 PMCid:PMC8371313

Bolton SM, Saker M, Bass LM. (2018, Oct). Button battery and magnet ingestions in the pediatric patient. Curr Opin Pediatr. 30(5): 653-659. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000665; PMid:30188872

MN, Demir M, Demir B, Demir I, Kilic O. (2014, Nov-Dec). Migration of ingested sewing needle from within sigmoid colon to outside of the lumen. Pak J Med Sci. 30(6): 1422-4. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.306.5423; PMid:25674151 PMCid:PMC4320743

Demiroren K. (2023, Jan). Management of Gastrointestinal Foreign Bodies with Brief Review of the Guidelines. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 26(1): 1-14. Epub 2023 Jan 10. https://doi.org/10.5223/pghn.2023.26.1.1; PMid:36816435 PMCid:PMC9911172

Dorterler ME, Günendi T, Çakmak M, Shermatova S. (2023, Jan-Mar). Bezoar types in children and aetiological factors affecting bezoar formation: A single-centre retrospective study. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 20(1): 8-11. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajps.ajps_70_21; PMid:36722563 PMCid:PMC10117012

Gatto A, Capossela L, Ferretti S, Orlandi M, Pansini V et al. (2021, Dec 15). Foreign Body Ingestion in Children: Epidemiological, Clinical Features and Outcome in a Third Level Emergency Department. Children (Basel). 8(12): 1182. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8121182; PMid:34943378 PMCid:PMC8700598

Goyal S. (2023). Stomach Foreign Body: A Retrospective Study with a Review. Ame J Surg Clin Case Rep. 7(2): 1-4. URL: https://ajsuccr.org/wp-content/themes/twentytwentyfour/all_assets/uploads/IMG_398492.pdf. https://doi.org/10.23880/jmcs-16000123

Gummin DD, Mowry JB, Beuhler MC, Spyker DA, Rivers LJ, Feldman R et al. (2023, Oct). National Poison Data System (NPDS) Annual Report 2022 from the American Poison Centers 40th Annual Report. Clin Toxicol. Clin Toxicol (Philadelphia). 61(10): 717-939. https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2023.2268981; PMid:38084513

Konoplitskyi VS, Dmytriiev DV, Kalinchuk OO, Konoplitskyi DV, Blazhko SS. (2019). Bezoarna khvoroba shlunkovo-kyshkovoho traktu u ditei (ohliad literatury ta interpretatsiia klinichnoho sposterezhennia. Journal of perioperative medicine. Clinical thinking. 2; 1: 52-58. https://doi.org/10.31636/prmd.v2i2.7

Lee JH. (2018, Mar). Foreign Body Ingestion in Children. Clin Endosc. 51(2): 129-136. Epub 2018 Mar 30. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.039; PMid:29618175 PMCid:PMC5903088

McMahon K, Conners GP, Mohseni M. (2025, May 1). Pediatric Foreign Body Ingestion. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430915/.

Park SJ, Burns H. (2022, Jul). Button battery injury: An update. Aust J Gen Pract. 51(7): 471-475. https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-03-21-5873; PMid:35773156

Rusak PS, Rybalchenko VF, Vyshpinska VM, Melnyk BA, Talko MO. (2013). Hihantskyi trykhobezoar shlunka ta dvanadtsiatypaloi kyshky u divchynky 15 rokiv. Khirurhiia dytiachoho viku. 2(39): 81-84.

Rybalchenko VF. (2013). Analiz roboty dytiachoi khirurhichnoi sluzhby Ukrainy u 2012 rotsi. Khirurhiia dytiachoho viku. 3: 24-33.

Rybalchenko VF, Rusak PS, Rinzberg BS, Nagornyuk NM, Sagan SV. (2023). Small intestinal obstruction by food in young children: a view on the problem, literature data and own clinical observations. Paediatric Surgery (Ukraine). 2(79): 92-98. https://doi.org/10.15574/PS.2023.79.92

Yigzaw KT, Mulualem DA, Asfaw BA, Moges MT, Tegegne BA et al. (2025, Mar 8). Uncommon cause of large bowel obstruction in a pediatric patient: A case of phytobezoar induced by peas. Radiol Case Rep. 20(5): 2393-2398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2025.01.097; PMid:40129837 PMCid:PMC11930502

Published

2026-03-28